For example I followed the conventions of a typical music video by using a variety of camera angles and shots. I did this with both my band and my main actress. I used close- ups, long shots, mid shots, shots from the side, and shots from above. The use of a variety of shots makes the video more entertaining and more interesting for the audience to watch, so in this aspect I believe that it is a good thing for me to have followed this convention. I used close ups to show the emotions of my actress several times throughout the video, and this helps make the story more apparent to the audience. As well as this I used close ups of my band in order to emphasise the lyrics at particular times in the video. This helps the audience to recognise the more important lyrics that need to be emphasised, whilst being a very subtle way of doing so.
I used the lighting in my video mainly to show the emotions of my actress. I used black and white lighting at the beginning, and right at the end of the video, to show her being upset, and not herself, and I used bright colours for the middle of the video on clips of her in her second look, which was more gothic, in order to show her as much happier and more comfortable. This technique is often used in other music videos in order to show emotions, as well as to show time in videos, (using black and white for the past). So therefore I also followed the conventions in this respect, however by not using any lighting techniques on my band during the video, I did not follow the conventions, as I was showing the audience the contrast between the two parts of the video.
I used editing which is often used in music videos as transitions between the clips, such as fade to black and dissolve or cross dissolve. This is very common as they are very subtle and effective transitions to go from one clip to the next without the audience realising. Although I did use some of my editing to challenge the typical conventions of a music video. I put some of the clips in reverse to add effect to my video, which is not something typically used, and it did go down well with the audience, as I had specific comments that they 'liked the reverse shots'.
I used mise en scene to emphasise some of the lyrics in my video as well, and to signify this importance to the audience. This is quite typical to see in music videos, however I felt that it was important to include.
For example during the lyrics "So I can burn up bright", I had a shot of my actress going through a path of tea lights in order to who the element of 'burning bright'.
Also during the lyrics "would someone meet me on the other side", I showed shots of my actress leaning against a fence, looking over to the other side, and climbing over this fence, to show her going to the other side.

I also think that my digipak follows the typical conventions as they tend to have a large and eye catching image on them, which is what I have included on mine with the whole of the front of my album as an image of two pictures merged together in black and white, which is very eye catching.
And it includes all of the typical information such as the artist name and the name of the album.
The back of the digipak typically contains a list of songs which is also what I have included on mine. They also usually have the artist or the album name, of which I have included the album name, and a barcode which I have also included on mine.
For my magazine advert, it doesn't follow all of the typical conventions, as it includes screenshots from the actual video, which these adverts do not usually include. However it does follow the conventions in the sense that it contains all of the necessary information such as the artist name, album name, release date, and any reviews or ratings from music magazines.















